✏ Working draft — Work in progress — Learn more
Physiological Rights ✎ GitHub

Inadequacy of the Right to Health

The right to health is a pillar of human rights, recognised in numerous international instruments, notably the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). It obliges States to guarantee access to quality health services, promote prevention, and create conditions conducive to good health.

However, this right suffers from a fundamental inadequacy: it is typically framed as an obligation of means rather than an obligation of results. The State must put health systems and prevention policies in place, but it is not required to guarantee that each individual achieves or maintains an optimal physiological state.

This distinction has concrete consequences:

General Comment 14 on ICESCR Art. 12 has however articulated a structure (availability, accessibility, acceptability, quality) whose last two terms directly call for individual physiological specificity. The systemic drift of the right to health is not required by the text; it has installed itself in practice. See The Instruments Already Exist on this gap between text and enforcement.

Physiological rights aim to close this gap by imposing an obligation of results for measurable physiological parameters. The issue is no longer merely providing means, but guaranteeing that every person has access to the interventions necessary to maintain or restore their organism’s normal physiological balance.

This page

Status

Published · Last revised July 2026

Read in

FR · ES · PT · DE · IT

Machine translation via Google. The English version prevails.